Does rebuilding a house on the same footprint in BC require an archaeological assessment?
Today it can, because the Heritage Conservation Act protects archaeological sites whether or not they are recorded; the Province's March 2026 policy paper proposes that a same-footprint rebuild would need no archaeological assessment at all, with legislative amendments anticipated in fall 2026.
Under the Act as it stands, archaeological sites are protected whether or not they have been recorded, on private land as much as public, and ground on a protected site cannot be disturbed without an assessment and a permit.2 The Act does not exempt a rebuild because a house stood there before. That is why Lytton homeowners rebuilding on their own lots were quoted $26,000 to $82,000 for assessments after the 2021 fire.
What the Province proposes
The Phase 3 Technical Policy Paper, posted March 26, 2026, says under its modified permitting proposal:1
If rebuilding a house on the same footprint or on imported fill atop a heritage site, no archaeological assessment work would be required and an HCA permit would have simplified requirements.
The paper's worked example puts it more plainly. Where construction happens on the same footprint as previous work, a proponent could proceed with simplified requirements, described as filling out a form, that do not require obtaining an archaeologist.1 The same provision is repeated under the paper's disaster recovery outcome, which names rebuilding after wildfires and floods as one of four goals for the modernised Act.
Nothing on this page is law yet
The paper states on nearly every page that its proposals are "subject to final decision from the Province", and the next step is a Request for Legislation before drafting begins.1 Amendments are anticipated in the fall 2026 legislative session.3 The same-footprint provision is a regulation-making authority, which means the Act would come first and the regulation after, with further engagement in between. Do not plan a 2026 build around it.
A new obligation pointing the other way
The same paper proposes that local governments require proof of an archaeological data check before issuing development and building permits where the work disturbs ground.1 The check is a free provincial service. Run it early regardless, because knowing before you design is worth more than knowing after, and the proposal would make it a condition of the permit.
Where this leaves a homeowner
If you are rebuilding now, assume the assessment is required and start it early. If you are planning a rebuild for 2027 or later, watch the fall session: the distinction that will matter is whether the work disturbs ground and whether it stays inside the existing footprint. The Union of BC Municipalities is tracking the file for local governments.4
One question per page. The first sentence is the answer. When a figure changes, the page changes and the verified date moves. All answers.